Abstract:
Abstract
Indigenous knowledge provides the basis for local-level decision-making about many fundamental aspects
of day-to-day life. As most of the rural people’s subsistence is emanated from agriculture, it properly
comprises the largest collection of indigenous practices in its sectors such as crop production, soil and
water conservation and livestock production. Ethiopia is the origin of the variety of indigenous crops and
diverse farming practices which have potentials to boost agricultural production. A growing awareness
of the value of indigenous knowledge has prompted calls for its use within agricultural development.
However, indigenous knowledge is still misrepresented in agricultural development intervention programs
in Ethiopia, due to lack of the scholarly conducted researches which can provide information as base for
policy formulation. Consequently, this research investigated the implications of indigenous knowledge in
in small scale farming for rural agricultural development in Amhara National Regional State in the case
of Guangua woreda. To this effort, mixed research approach has been employed. The combination of the
two methods is important to obtain accurate and realistic picture of information by overcoming possible
shortcomings of using each method alone. The research was concurrent in terms of design in which
qualitative and quantitative data were collected correspondingly and has been triangulated during
analysis. Purposive sampling technique has been employed to select the study areas and participants for
qualitative approach. While systematic random sampling technique has been used to select respondents
for survey. Sample size for survey has been determined by using proportional random sampling technique.
Totally, 407 participants were selected for both qualitative and quantitative data collections. The data has
been collected through observation, survey, FGD, KII and document analysis. The collected data were
analyzed based on methods used to generate. Accordingly, qualitative data were analyzed via
thematic analysis while quantitative data were analyzed via descriptive and inferential statistics.
This study identified that, farmers of the study area has developed indigenous soil fertility status
indicators of their farm lands. In doing so, farmers have been using soil fertility conservation
mechanisms such as cutting canal, unplowed strips and stone bunds/terracing if they found their
fertility status is high. While they have been using indigenous soil fertility improvement
mechanism like manure, dung, crop residue, fallowing, mixed cropping and crop rotation if they
consider their land fertility status is low. Manure was rated as to be important than other soil
fertility improvement mechanisms. Likewise, cutting canal was rated as the most important soil
fertility conservation mechanism. It was also explored that, as farmers have developed various
indigenous techniques to control crop herbs and pests which has comparative advantage over
modern techniques. In spite of this, the majority of respondents 73.7% have used modern
pest/weed protection techniques due to different constraints’. As 51.6% of the respondents
identified, the main source of information regarding indigenous agricultural knowledge is
community via traditional ways knowledge transfer. Despite potentials to be utilized for boosting
rural agricultural development, development agent’s misperception, little academic coverage and
agricultural policy related problems were extracted as challenges that have been facing IAK. To
harness the strengths of the both knowledge systems for enhanced rural agricultural development,
the study suggested that establishing participatory on farm research center and multiple evidence
base approach as ways of integrating IAK with modern knowledge.